It is obvious that the conflict between groups may be born because of the difference in the assessment of morality, not because of its complete absence within one of the groups. It must be, accept as a norm that every set even the most radical group managed to produce a certain type, even if the original culture, and only the strength to break the group determines its future in the perception of other people's opinions. Proceed here to claim that cultural dominance, however, has been in the past fought for, is due to its size, the determinant of moral attitudes yet undecided and vulnerable groups. Therefore, moral judgments are for offensive operations could lead to a real collision of cultures. So now you can bet at this point the question whether the absence of the phenomenon the collision of cultures, would be through lack of moral judgments? Collision of cultures is not only the nature of open conflict between two communities, but this phenomenon must be understood as a clash of old and new ideas within the community, and between different interest groups. You can to add, that this is a dynamic process and occurs in cycles, occurring due to the escalating conflict wartoĊci.Gdy comes to this type of collision, the participating groups survive by P. Sztompka trauma that affects the greatest defeat of the parties. Trauma is understood It is a whole sequence of events are mostly negative. It can be noted precisely in situations of conflict and crisis in relations between the groups. Collision of cultures is so crucial phenomenon of the nature of conflictive and causing injuries. Such a shock can see examples of crisis situations with which we deal today, when it comes to financial markets to conflict and clash of old and new values. Economic crisis erupted, is the moment in which the conflicting groups experiencing trauma and could be due to factors not so much economic, partly as a lack of moral conduct evaluations over the past years. To cite an explanation that the events of today's financial markets are a consequence of past decisions made in the U.S. market, where he was allowed to grant mortgage loans to persons without work, without guarantees and without money, thanks to a declaration of intent. Only now lived in the trauma and conflict, comes to the assessments of the behaviors that are conducive to the collision-formed. So you can at this point to say that no moral judgments about people's behavior caused the global economic crisis. Formulating a sentence or otherwise, Today's guest immoral behavior causes a crisis constructed norms and values.
Thus we see that life on earth without moral judgments were to be continuous, linear growth or degradation. Without a crisis of norms and values \u200b\u200bwould not conflict, only one-sided development. It is, however, ask whether it would be a development or social degradation? Within the limits of work and without going into too much conjecture to emphasize the importance of moral judgments and the resulting conflicts. A common argument seems to be, that conflict is something harmful to society that the conflict creates aggression, and aggression lead to the destruction of the order built on the old norms and values. However, we must make the distinction, because the conflict is not one. Conflicts because we share the right and wrong.
Unfair is the conflict that is destructive and the right is the one which occurs due to the entry into new structures of the old norms and values. If we assume that, the conflict does not destroy the old culture and not replace it with new values \u200b\u200bonly tested, and only transform the old ideals in the spirit of the time and prefer people, it will be a creative conflict, which despite its traumatogennego change of character, will have a positive impact on people.
See also:
0 comments:
Post a Comment